we are not safe and that is the god awful truth for we’re treated as nothing more than chattel most times under the veneer of civility hiding lessons learned from youth such that you can hit a woman because she must have done something to deserve it and even if she didn’t, you can still hurt her because you’ve seen everyone do it. for she’s something to look at. she’s something to adore. she’s some thing you can tuck away in a corner when you feel like it. she’s a thing to use and nothing more. maybe sometimes she’ll give her consent to do to her as you please with set boundaries you may both agree upon and a simple word to put her back at ease. but such is not the case for most women out there and how I wish this were not true.
we were never safe then and more so now. is there a way to change all this, starting with me and you?
this is no world for little girls
even with their fancy dresses and sweet curls
where one by one they disappear
never meant again to reappear
like a phantasm in broad daylight
they’re there, yet they’re not
seen only when wanted, desired
then strangled, hanged, and shot
bargained, traded, cheated and sold
how can I tell little girls though so bold
that this world was never meant for them
where their very existence has them condemned
but we’re here now and we’ve a life to live
even though we do nothing but give and give
while they, they take and take some more
leaving us spent, battered, and sore
some of us left hanging in the wind
while perpetrators go free to do it all over again
what world is there for little girls
where there is no why, just where and when
broken bodies strewn in the night
smiles forever wiped away from sight
this is no world for little girls
now with torn-up dresses and weary curls.
In Old Manila, we learned that there was a caste system of sorts, beginning – from the highest level – the Peninsulares (Spaniards born in Spain), Insulares (Spaniards born in the colonies, like Philippines or Mexico), mestizos (those of mixed Spanish blood), Sangleys (Filipinos with Chinese blood), and indios (natives).
Women within these classes also had roles to play to maintain their status, especially for the wealthy and educated classes. The rise of idealized version of the Filipino woman, as depicted by Jose Rizal’s mestiza or mixed-race Maria Clara, epitomizes an almost-universal view of how Filipino women continue to be seen by many, as someone who is shy, timid, and unquestioning.
Yet there was another group of Filipino women in the 19th century that was so far removed from the mythical being or the idealized version of Maria Clara. She was the india, the native or local Filipino woman, comprising rest of the population of women in Old Manila (apart from the wealthy mixed-race women of the upper classes).
These were the working women of Old Manila, and according to Ma. Luisa Camagay, they were:
Cigarreras – those who rolled cigars
Vendaderas or tenderas – vendors and shopkeepers
Bordadoras and costareras – embroiders and seamstresses
Criadas – domestic servants
Maestras – teachers
Matronas titulares – schooled midwives
Mujeres publicas – prostitutes
Majority of the working women of Old Manila were employed by the tobacco factories as cigareras, the ones who deftly rolled cured tobacco leaves into cigars. In 1816, cigareras staged a walkout after having had enough of the terrible working conditions.
“…One of their demands was for the tobacco leaves be given to them ready for rolling since, they claimed, they were not being paid for the added tasks of cleaning and stretching the leaves. In response, management acted immediately and favorably on all their complaints and demands.
The job of cigarrera ranked first as a career option for Filipino women in the 19th century Manila mainly because the tobacco monopoly, which was at the time a huge government business, aggressively recruited the women into the factory system.
“The cigar factories alone employed more than twenty thousand workers, mostly women. Those who failed to get employment in the factories became labradora, lavandera, costurera, domicilla, or tindera. Many of them became prostitutes as manifested in the court records (espedientes) of the period.
The vendaderas or vendors carried around their portable stores of vegetables, fruits, or fresh carabao milk watered down with coconut water or water left from the washing of rice to cut costs. The tenderas or shopkeepers opened small shops from their homes, selling customers (who were usually their own neighbors) everything from eggs, fruits, and knick knacks.
The bordadoras and costareras, embroiderers and seamstresses, respectively, worked at making the beautiful clothes for the upper classes, often unable to even afford a yard of the piña cloth they wove or embroidered on from scratch.
The criadas worked for the wealthy families. Usually around 13 years old, they cooked the food, cleaned the house, fetched water for baths, and washed the clothes.
If one received a college education, one could work as a maestra although the pay was very low. She educated many of the rich families’ children and traveled wherever the work took her.
The matrones titulares (schooled midwives) were responsible for birthing the children of the wealthy, though she is not to be confused with the matrona or partera (midwife), who was without a degree or a license from the university. However, she did not have the appropriate education to treat diseases.
The pay for these lines of work would often be so low that many of the women ended up as mujeres publicas or prostitutes. They were known as vagamundas, indocumentadas (the latter two because of her traveling lifestyle and that she usually did not possess the cedula, the form of identification for tax purposes in Old Manila), and prostitutas, and often came from far-flung areas of the country.
Prostitutes arrested in the 19th century were in their late teens and early 20’s. Older prostitutes who were in their 30’s or 40’s were either married or widowed.
“Spanish legalization of gambling as a source of revenue added to the inhabitants’ demoralization. In many cases, it was a major reason for men made destitute by gambling to induce their wives or women friends to engage in prostitution or to commit crimes…Even Governor William H. Taft noted that the gambling habit among the inhabitants was ‘so great that men will gamble the chastity of their daughters and their wives” just to satisfy their vice.”
There were four categories of prostitutes, depending on where they worked and who their clients were.
The first category were the ones who worked in prostitution houses, usually ran by an ama or amo, a pimp.
“…They were native Filipinos who stated their profession as cigarrera or costurera. The Filipino amo identified himself as a sastre so it was not surprising that this tailor would act as an amo considering that he did have access to the male population who might desire the services of a prostitute.
Another category of prostitutes included those who plied their trade by posting themselves along certain streets like Calle Iris of Quiapo, Paseo de Azcarraga, Gandara, and Santa Cruz, Binondo and Singalong, Herran, San Marcelino in Paco Dilao under the supervision of amas or amos.
….Another category of prostitutes visited their clients in their own homes. These were the prostitutes who, from the archival sources, rendered service to Chinese males who came to the Philippines both single and married. Serapia was the name of their pimp, or corredora.
Finally, the last category of prostitutes included women who invited clients back to their own homes. Belonging to this category were Madame Sanchez, a Spaniard who lived in No. 6 Calle Uli-uli in San Miguel; Antonelle, an American who lived in No. 16 Calle Labasan in Sampaloc; and Lorenza, an Englishwoman who lived in No. 20 Calle Balmes in Quiapo. Presumably these women catered to men who belonged to the higher echelons of society.”
If they were arrested, punishment usually meant being exiled to far-flung areas such as Davao in the southern island of Mindanao or Palawan. However, they could be saved from such fate in two ways – (1) petition from their parents to the governor-general or the friar-curate or (2) an offer of marriage.
“Petitions of mothers and father of prostitutes were made to the Governor-General. Invoking reasons such as ill health, citing that the daughter was the sole breadwinner of the family or even issuing an outright denial of her activities as a prostitute by mothers was a common ploy used to avoid being deported to Mindanao.
Marriage or the offer of marriage circumvented the deportation of a prostitute. The Servidumbres Dometicas of the National Archives reads that, in 1849, Romana Pablo was on the list of those to be deported to Davao but was spared from exile because of Gilberto Escueta’s request for permission to marry her. Sotera Almario was likewise spared from serving this punishment when Don Jose Maria Medina, a Spanish mestizo, requested that she be released from prison because he planned to marry her.
….Marriage was viewed as a means of reforming prostitutes. For these prostitutes, marriage was thought to be a means of “sobering them up.” Based upon available records after three years, a deportee could petition the Governor-General to end her deportation.
Wow, I never thought I’d have way more information about prostitutes in Old Manila than any other. Well, there was a lot to write about the cigarera, but nothing, I believe, can trump the idea of reformation by marriage.